According to the New England Journal of Medicine1, dense breast tissue increases a woman’s risk of breast cancer up to five-fold. While mammography remains the method of choice for breast cancer screening, a study2 published by the RSNA in 2002 found that the detection rate for nonpalpable, invasive breast cancers increased by 42 percent when mammography was followed by an ultrasound examination. Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) with ultrasound, as possible with the ACUSON S2000™ ABVS* system, may thus make a significant contribution to diagnostic confidence for women with dense breast tissue and inconclusive mammograms.
Examinations performed with the ACUSON S2000 ABVS system take approximately ten minutes, which is time well spent considering the extended diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound in dense breasts. The system automatically and quickly acquires full-field sonographic volumes for comprehensive review and diagnosis of the breast, streamlining workflow and reducing operator dependence and variability. The ACUSON S2000 ABVS system also features the intuitive anatomical coronal plane not available using conventional ultrasound. This view provides a more understandable representation of the global anatomy and architecture of the breast. Semi-automated reporting and comprehensive BI-RADS® reporting capabilities further enhance the clinical workflow.**
An innovative, mobile in-suite design combines the advanced ACUSON S2000 ultrasound system with a transducer specifically designed for automated ultrasound breast volume imaging. To further optimize high-volume patient care, the system also supports innovative breast imaging applications, such as fatty tissue and eSie Touch™ elasticity imaging.
• Dedicated breast ultrasound scanner providing full-field volume imaging of the breast for streamlined workflow
• Includes view of the intuitive anatomical coronal plane, not available with conventional ultrasound
• ABVS Workplace***
supports intuitive volume image analysis, manipulation, and comprehensive BI-RADS reporting capabilities
1N Engl J Med 356;3. Boyd N.F. et Al., Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer
2 Radiology 2002;225:165-175. Kolb T.M. et al., Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations
* 510 (k) pending, not available in the U.S.
** BI-RADS is a trademark of the American College of Radiology
*** Not available in the U.S.